Wednesday, 27 April 2011

Meeting with the Planners

After our file review we had a 'play date' with the 3rd year planning students.  This was organized by our tutors and was to help us form connections with each other.  This may be useful in the future, both within and outside of the school.  We did a finger painting exercise to help us break the ice.  We had to try and convey what we thought the other degree was all about with finger painting.  We were put into small groups of 5 for this.  Within our small group the architect students thought that planning was about looking at the whole of a cities layout, the connections between different elements and the infrastructure to support the city.  This was true - the planners also look at the cultural and social impact of city planning.  They had just come back from a trip to a Marae, looking at the importance of culture and how planning impacts everyday life.  
 The planning students saw architecture mainly as the finished product - the building, usually referred to as something large scale.  Amy drew and talked about how there is many design decisions and thought that goes into a building.  She said that while we see a finished product, there was much thought and process to get there.  It was nice to see that others outside of Architecture school can appreciate what goes into designing.  

Sunday, 3 April 2011

3D Printer Testing

As I am looking at making elements that clip together, I need to know how flexible and strong the 3D printed elements can be.  I made a simple clip and tube to fit it around.  The clip is flexible enough to stretch around the tube, but after a while the layers do start to peel.

Jewellery Box - Conceptial Thinking

I have been struggling to find a form and idea that will combine the ideas from my jewellery, details, theorist that I like.  I will create some sketches and conceptual images to help.  I am trying to work out the form and details of the jewellery box.  A box that is not a box...
A box is...
Linear, 3Dimensional, functional, contained, portable, geometric, stationary, closed...
A box that is not a box...
No volume, no edge, no corners, blurred, no form, no function... 




Jewellery Box

Using our details, we had to create one image that would show where we intend on heading with our jewellery box design.  
I had made the outline of box nets out of wire and folded them like you would a box.  When photographed and traced they made an interesting image.  I like how they suggest the shape of a box (a form we all easily recognize) without having any of the functions of a jewellery box.  This shifts the context and our perception of a box.  Maybe the box only has its complete form when it is being used - function creates form? 
I like the graphic nature of this image, as well as the line/sketchiness of it.  The boxes are interesting - particuarly the gaps between the bent wire.  

Detail

We had to find some more building details to help us develop our jewellery and jewellery box.  I looked at two building details by Diller, Scofidio + Renfro (both of stairways) as well as some details that show clipping and interlocking building elements. 
From the stair details by Diller I have taken the philosophy of shifting the context - we have a space for movement that has seats and a space that you expect to be built up that is instead cut down into the material.  I will attempt to shift the context of the box - a box that is not a box?  They use space and materials in such innovative ways.   
The clipping and interlocking of the other details relate back to my jewellery.  Can I include these design elements in the box? 

  

Jewellery - Development

Our first chance to use a 3D Printer!  I have modeled a way to clip the playing card elements of my bracelet together.  I wanted the cards to still have some semblance of volume, so the clips curve as well.  Each section will be attached to the next by a pin.
The actual printing was not that successful.  One of the surfaces did not print, so the design does not hold together properly.  The bracelet elements would be to fiddly for the wearer to put together, and only one size can be made.  More development is needed.



Wednesday, 23 March 2011

Theorist Elizabeth Diller - 1954-present





Elizabeth Diller could be considered an accidental architect.  Starting out studying for an arts degree, she took an architecture paper to better study space and culture.  She enjoyed it so much she completed her degree in Architecture instead. 
Even once she was in practice, (at Diller + Scofidio, with husband and business partner Ricardo Scofidio, and later Diller, Scofidio + Renfro), she did not look to undertake mainstream architectural projects.  Instead, most of her early work was installation pieces – art, video, electronic.  As Diller went into practice, she also started lecturing at Princeton University.  Learning and research are very important at Diller’s firm.  Every project has a vast amount of research backing up the design ideas.  Some works are research projects that have later produced designs.  Diller does not prescribe to the modern design theory of “I was inspired by…”.  Every design is well thought out and backed up with information. 
Despite her understated start in the architectural world, genius does not go unnoticed.  Diller and Scofidio were joint winners of the first McArthur grant awarded to architects.  Diller was capable of undertaking extensive research and innovative, experimental projects due to the monetary freedom gifted by her joint win.  They took one semester off from lecturing every year for five years to work full time at their practice.  This is when they started to work on some bigger, built projects (like the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston).
Diller’s works all look at the innovative use of space, cultural and societal influences and some shift of context.  Whether this shift is like in the Blur Building, where water creates the space instead of being the element to be contained or built against; or the shift is in a stair detail, where the stairs are cut down instead of pushed up, there is always a contextual shift.   
Culture, space, movement, context, media.